Category research · Reviewed August 2026

Self-hosted crypto trading bots researched

Products that can run their trading runtime on infrastructure controlled by the user.

Selection methodology and scope

The current product must document a supported self-hosted deployment—not merely a local companion application.

Placement reflects category fit and evidence, never affiliate relationships. The Expert Score remains a product-wide calculation.

Category risks

Local hosting reduces shared infrastructure but can introduce exposed dashboards, weak TLS, malware, unpatched dependencies and unsafe backups.

Selected products

3 products meet this scope

Review the complete rating methodology
#1

HaasOnline

Grid · DCA · Signals · Market Making · Self-hosted

74/100Expert score

Advanced TradeServer automation offered through cloud plans and a self-hosted edition, with HaasScript, backtesting and broad exchange coverage.

Moderate riskTrust 71Paid
#2

OctoBot

Open Source · Self-hosted · DCA · AI · Signals

74/100Expert score

Open-source crypto automation available for self-hosting or through OctoBot Cloud, with DCA, baskets, TradingView and paper trading.

Moderate riskTrust 69Freemium
#3

Gunbot

Self-hosted · Grid · DCA · Futures

72/100Expert score

Locally run trading automation with lifetime licenses, Grid bots, custom JavaScript, backtesting and an authenticated REST API.

Moderate riskTrust 65Paid

Editorial conclusion

HaasOnline, Gunbot and OctoBot represent different proprietary, open-source and managed-hybrid tradeoffs; self-hosting is not automatically safer.

Permission boundariesReviewed using product-specific evidence and the same published scoring framework.

Strategy controlsReviewed using product-specific evidence and the same published scoring framework.

Evidence limitationsReviewed using product-specific evidence and the same published scoring framework.

Pricing transparencyReviewed using product-specific evidence and the same published scoring framework.